Wednesday, March 28, 2012

GM Perspective of LA Dodgers Sale



One of the preeminent goals of any General Manager is to put the best possible team on the field that he can, given the resources at his disposal. Well, the resources at Ned Colletti’s (or whoever the next GM is) disposal just got a bit larger.

It was announced yesterday that the LA Dodgers would be sold to a group of bidders that included Magic Johnson for a whopping 2.1 Billion dollars. Yes, that is Billion with a B. Crazy. That is a Billion dollars more than any other franchise has sold for. Why so much? The Dodgers are located in the potentially largest market in the United States, Los Angeles. They have a history as a franchise, which means that they have a loyal fanbase. They also have a humongous television market, which will allow them to have enormously deep pockets in terms of player spending.

As a GM, the possibilities suddenly became endless. This year, the Dodgers payroll is at $90 million dollars, which is smack in the middle of the league. I would expect that number to rise by several (dozens) million over the next few years. The Dodgers General Manager will now have the freedom to pursue marquee free agents, so players in the 2013 free agent class (Ervin Santana, Francisco Liriano, Zack Greinke, Josh Hamilton, BJ Upton, Delmon Young) should all be options. My guess is that money will still be regulated, but I assume that the payroll will end up in the 130-150 Million dollar a year range.

As far as actual control over player movements, I could see the ownership wanting to take a large role in player decisions. For a GM, that can be helpful, or it can be a nightmare. Even though a GM has a lot of power, his ownership group has the final say over player movements and contracts, and if they consider themselves baseball experts, that can be crippling to a general manager’s freedom to build a team.

I suppose we just need to hope that Magic and his cohorts can sit back, trust their staff, and watch the wins and money roll into Los Angeles.

No comments:

Post a Comment