It seems, if you are getting involved in the business to win an NBA championship, you need a dominating center. The last 12 years go Lakers, Lakers, Celtics, Spurs, Heat, Spurs, Pistons, Spurs, Lakers, Lakers, Lakers, Spurs. Of those 12 teams, It can be argued that the best, or most important players on each team were enormous, or at least really big:
- For the first Laker's dynasty and Miami's single dip, Shaq.
- For the Spurs three championships, Tim Duncan was the common factor.
- For the most recent three of Lakers and Celtics, Pau Gasol and Kevin Garnett were (arguably) the most important players on those teams.
- Even the Pistons got over the hump by the mid-season pickup of Rasheed Wallace.
Obviously, your team is going to make a lot of money if you win an NBA championship. However, what are the chances that you win an O'Brien trophy if you are drafting a potential star? At least in the short term, not good. So does it make more sense to make money with an exciting young athlete while you try to build your team? These are the kinds of questions that haunt me as a wannabe GM. I think the most important lesson has to be: as a General Manager, it's never all about the basketball, as much as you may like it to be.
Always go with a Little.
ReplyDelete